|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]冯梦媛,叶玥豪,孙玮,等.西昌盆地下古生界筇竹寺组与龙马溪组烃源岩特征[J].断块油气田,2021,(01):72-77.[doi:10.6056/dkyqt202101013]
 FENG Mengyuan,YE Yuehao,SUN Wei,et al.Characteristics of source rocks of Qiongzhusi Formation and Longmaxi Formation of Lower Paleozoic in Xichang Basin[J].Fault-Block Oil and Gas Field,2021,(01):72-77.[doi:10.6056/dkyqt202101013]
点击复制

西昌盆地下古生界筇竹寺组与龙马溪组烃源岩特征(PDF)
分享到:

《断块油气田》[ISSN:1005-8907/CN:41-1219/TE]

卷:
期数:
2021年01
页码:
72-77
栏目:
地质勘探
出版日期:
2021-01-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Characteristics of source rocks of Qiongzhusi Formation and Longmaxi Formation of Lower Paleozoic in Xichang Basin
文章编号:
13
作者:
冯梦媛1叶玥豪1孙玮1宋金明1丁一1谢国梁1邵红君2
1.成都理工大学油气藏地质及开发工程国家重点实验室,四川 成都 610059; 2.中国石油大庆油田有限责任公司勘探开发研究院,黑龙江 大庆 163712
Author(s):
FENG Mengyuan1 YE Yuehao1 SUN Wei1 SONG Jinming1 DING Yi1 XIE Guoliang1 SHAO Hongjun2
1.State Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Reservior Geology and Exploitation, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China; 2.Research Institute of Exploration and Development, Daqing Oilfield Company Ltd., PetroChina, Daqing 163712, China
关键词:
烃源岩地球化学特征筇竹寺组龙马溪组西昌盆地
Keywords:
source rocks geochemical characteristics Qiongzhusi Formation Longmaxi Formation Xichang Basin
分类号:
TE122.1+13
DOI:
10.6056/dkyqt202101013
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
文中基于露头和钻井资料,通过岩石学、地球化学等手段,对西昌盆地下古生界下寒武统筇竹寺组和下志留统龙马溪组的烃源岩进行了评价。研究结果表明:1)筇竹寺组主要岩性有5种,为一套潮坪 ̄浅水陆棚相沉积,厚度自东向西变薄并逐渐尖灭;龙马溪组主要岩性有4种,为一套浅水陆棚—深水陆棚相沉积,厚度自东向西变薄并逐渐尖灭。2)筇竹寺组总有机碳质量分数(TOC)在0.042%~0.800%,平均值小于0.5%,烃源岩不发育,生烃潜量(S1+S2 )介于0.08~0.65 mg/g,镜质组反射率(Ro)在2.00%~3.00%,岩石热解最高峰温(Tmaх)在422~453 ℃,处于过热成熟演化阶段;龙马溪组TOC在0.043%~5.100%,平均值小于1.445%,烃源岩在下部较发育,S1+S2介于0.01~2.01 mg/g,Ro在2.10%~2.46%,有机质成熟度高,处于过成熟演化阶段。3)龙马溪组烃源岩的生烃量为3.59×108 m3,与四川盆地南缘龙马溪组生烃强度相差较大,故西昌盆地下古生界油气勘探前景相对较差。
Abstract:
Based on outcrop and drilling data, the source rocks of Lower Cambrian Qiongzhusi Formation and Lower Silurian Longmaxi Formation of Lower Paleozoic in Xichang Basin are evaluated by means of petrology and geochemistry. The results show that:(1) the Qiongzhusi Formation has five main lithologies, which is a set of tidal flat-shallow shelf facies, and it becomes thinner from east to west and gradually pinches out; Longmaxi Formation has four main lithology, which is a set of shallow water shelf-deep shelf facies deposit, and it becomes thinner from east to west and gradually pinches out. (2) The TOC content of Qiongzhusi Formation ranges from 0.042% to 0.800%, with an average of less than 0.5%, the source rock is undeveloped. The hydrocarbon generation potential value(S1+S2) is between 0.08 mg/g and 0.65 mg/g, the vitrinite reflectance (Ro) is between 2.0% and 3.0%, the maximum pyrolysis temperature (Tmax) is between 422 ℃ and 453 ℃, and it is in the stage of over mature evolution. The TOC content of Longmaxi Formation is between 0.043% and 5.100%, with an average of less than 1.445%. The source rock is relatively developed in the lower part, S1+S2 is between 0.01 mg/g and 2.01 mg/g, Ro is between 2.10% and 2.46%, the organic matter maturity is high, and it is in the stage of over mature evolution. (3) The hydrocarbon generation intensity of Longmaxi Formation is 3.59×108 m3, which is quite different from that of Longmaxi Formation in the southern margin of Sichuan Basin, so the exploration prospect of Lower Paleozoic in Xichang Basin is relatively poor.

参考文献/References:

-

相似文献/References:

[1]庄新兵,邹华耀,李 楠,等.秦南凹陷烃源岩特征与油气勘探新领域[J].断块油气田,2011,18(02):146.
 Zhuang Xinbing Zou Huayao Li Nan Yang Yuanyuan Sun Hefeng.Characteristics of source rock and new region of oil and gas exploration in Qinnan Sag[J].Fault-Block Oil and Gas Field,2011,18(01):146.
[2]金洪蕊,陈致林,刘 旋,等.沾化凹陷五号桩地区高蜡油地球化学特征[J].断块油气田,2009,16(05):10.
 Jin Hongrui,Chen Zhilin,Liu Xuan,et al.Geochemical characteristics of high-waxy oil in Wuhaozhuang Area of Zhanhua Sag[J].Fault-Block Oil and Gas Field,2009,16(01):10.
[3]王 鹂,唐成磊,王 飞.Δlg R技术在烃源岩评价中的应用[J].断块油气田,2009,16(02):52.
 Wang Li Tang Chenglei Wang Fei.Application of △lg R technology in hydrocarbon source rocks evaluation[J].Fault-Block Oil and Gas Field,2009,16(01):52.
[4]胡晓庆,金 强,王秀红,等.烃源岩二次生烃热模拟实验研究进展[J].断块油气田,2009,16(03):8.
[5]崔 鸣,朱战军,王雁冰,等.松辽盆地东岭区块烃源岩成熟度[J].断块油气田,2009,16(04):40.
 Cui Ming Zhu Zhanjun Wang Yanbing Sun Wei Liu Feng Tang Zhiyong Peng Guoliang.Maturity of source rocks in Dongling Area of Songliao Basin[J].Fault-Block Oil and Gas Field,2009,16(01):40.
[6]张功成.济源凹陷盆地结构构造特征与油气勘探前景 [J].断块油气田,1997,04(05):5.
[7]郭飞飞,张先平,吴 娟,等.沉湖地区油气系统演化与成藏模式[J].断块油气田,2010,17(02):150.
[8]李存贵,薛国刚,赵习森,等.文西断裂带油气成藏条件研究[J].断块油气田,2003,10(03):12.
 [J].Fault-Block Oil and Gas Field,2003,10(01):12.
[9]陈广军,张林晔.胜利油区孤北洼陷孔店组生烃潜力探讨[J].断块油气田,2002,09(06):9.
 Chen Guangjun,Zhang Linye.Discussion on the Hydrocarbon Potential of Ek in Gubei Low-lying of Shengli Oil Region[J].Fault-Block Oil and Gas Field,2002,09(01):9.
[10]陈小军,罗顺社,张建坤.冀北坳陷长龙山组沉积相与地球化学特征研究[J].断块油气田,2010,17(03):270.
[11]王淑玉,刘海燕,董 虎,等.东濮凹陷桥口-白庙地区天然气分布与成因探讨[J].断块油气田,2011,18(02):207.
 Wang Shuyu Liu Haiyan Dong Hu Liu Jianyun Zhu Li Xu Baojie.Distribution and origin of natural gas in Qiaokou-Baimiao Area, Dongpu Depression[J].Fault-Block Oil and Gas Field,2011,18(01):207.
[12]龚永杰,蒋有录,何胜.金湖凹陷东部油源对比研究[J].断块油气田,2008,15(02):16.
 Gong Yongjie,Jiang Youlu,He Sheng..Research on oil and source rock correlation in east Jinhu Depression[J].Fault-Block Oil and Gas Field,2008,15(01):16.
[13]张云献,刘海燕,巩卫芳,等.东濮凹陷北部芳烃色谱-质谱分析及石油地质应用[J].断块油气田,2012,19(06):727.[doi:10.6056/dkyqt201206011]
 Zhang Yunxian,Liu Haiyan,Gong Weifang,et al.GC-MS analysis of aromatic hydrocarbon and its application in petroleum geology in north area of Dongpu Depression[J].Fault-Block Oil and Gas Field,2012,19(01):727.[doi:10.6056/dkyqt201206011]
[14]王辉,朱占平,宋土顺,等.突泉盆地中侏罗统万宝组沉积环境与烃源岩特征[J].断块油气田,2019,26(06):687.[doi:10.6056/dkyqt201906002]
 WANG Hui,ZHU Zhanping,SONG Tushun,et al.Sedimentary environment and characteristics of hydrocarbon source rock of Middle Jurassic Wanbao Formation in Tuquan Basin[J].Fault-Block Oil and Gas Field,2019,26(01):687.[doi:10.6056/dkyqt201906002]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
-
更新日期/Last Update: 2021-01-25